How giving control to employees increases productivity and reduces stress
Organizational Solutions
Erwin van den Burg
Organizational Solutions
01/03/2026
7 min
0

How Managers Can Give Teams More Influence Over Their Work

01/03/2026
7 min
0

Managers today face a difficult balancing act.

They need teams that perform well, adapt quickly, and remain engaged under increasing demands. At the same time, many employees report feeling mentally exhausted, overwhelmed, or unable to recover properly between working days.

Workload certainly contributes to this picture.

So do staffing levels, conflicting priorities, unclear expectations, and constant interruptions.

Another important factor is the degree of influence people have over how they carry out their work.

Research has consistently shown that employees experience less stress when they have meaningful influence over decisions that affect their daily work. This does not mean deciding everything themselves. It means having enough flexibility to organise tasks, solve problems, and use their professional judgement within clear organisational goals.

For managers, this raises an important question.

How can people be given greater influence over their work while maintaining clear direction, accountability, and consistent quality?

Understanding why influence affects the way people experience pressure helps answer that question.

Key Takeaways

  • Having meaningful influence over how work is organised is one of the strongest factors supporting long-term wellbeing at work.
  • Greater influence does not eliminate demanding work, but it helps people respond to challenges with greater flexibility and confidence.
  • Managers can strengthen employee wellbeing while maintaining clear leadership by combining clear expectations with appropriate autonomy.
  • Trust and responsibility reinforce one another as employees gain greater ownership of their work.
  • Small changes in leadership practice can improve both wellbeing and sustainable performance across the organisation.

How Influence Changes the Experience of Pressure

Every working day presents people with demands.

Deadlines.

Unexpected problems.

Changing priorities.

Difficult conversations.

The brain continuously evaluates whether these demands can be managed successfully.

One factor that strongly influences this evaluation is the degree of influence people feel they have over the situation.

When employees can organise their work, prioritise tasks, or solve problems using their own professional judgement, the brain can make more reliable predictions about what will happen next.

Greater predictability reduces unnecessary uncertainty and supports healthier adaptation to sustained pressure.

Why the Same Workload Can Feel So Different

Two employees may carry similar workloads yet experience them very differently.

One may describe the work as challenging and engaging.

The other may feel trapped, frustrated, or mentally exhausted.

One factor contributing to these different experiences is the degree of influence each person has over how work is organised and carried out.

Someone who can decide how to structure the day, sequence tasks, or adjust priorities generally has greater flexibility when unexpected situations arise.

Someone who must constantly wait for approval, respond to changing instructions, or work within rigid procedures has fewer opportunities to adapt as circumstances change.

Over time, these differences influence how sustained pressure is experienced.

What Research Has Shown About Influence

One of the best-known examples comes from the Whitehall studies, which followed thousands of British civil servants over many years.

Researchers expected senior employees to experience the greatest stress because they carried the greatest responsibility.

Instead, they found that employees lower in the organisational hierarchy generally experienced poorer health outcomes and higher rates of stress-related illness.

An important difference was the amount of influence people had over their daily work.

Employees with fewer opportunities to make decisions, organise their work, or influence how tasks were carried out experienced greater long-term health risks than colleagues with more autonomy.

Subsequent occupational health research has repeatedly confirmed that meaningful influence over one's work is one of the strongest factors supporting long-term wellbeing.

This does not mean that senior managers or executives experience little stress.

Leadership roles often involve considerable pressure arising from organisational responsibility, financial uncertainty, competing priorities, and expectations originating higher in the organisation or from external stakeholders.

As discussed in our article Stress at the Top: Why CEOs Aren't Always as Calm as They Look, the nature of workplace stress often changes with seniority. The Whitehall studies specifically highlighted how influence over day-to-day work shapes the experience of pressure among employees lower in organisational hierarchies.

Leadership Creates the Conditions for Influence

Increasing employee influence works best within a framework of clear goals, expectations, and responsibilities.

People generally perform best when they understand what they are trying to achieve while having enough flexibility to decide how those goals can be reached.

Managers continue to play an essential role by:

  • defining priorities;
  • setting clear expectations;
  • allocating resources;
  • coordinating across teams;
  • removing obstacles;
  • supporting good decision making.

Within that framework, employees can often make many day-to-day decisions themselves.

This combination of clear direction and appropriate autonomy allows teams to respond effectively when circumstances change while enabling managers to maintain oversight of the broader picture.

Helping Teams Make More Decisions

Research on job design and occupational health suggests that relatively small changes can increase employees' sense of influence without reducing accountability.

Involve employees in decisions that affect their work

People who contribute to decisions about workflows, schedules, or priorities are generally more committed to implementing them.

Involvement also improves the quality of decisions because employees often have detailed knowledge of the practical challenges involved.

Clarify outcomes while allowing flexibility

Employees usually benefit from clear objectives together with enough flexibility to organise their own work.

This encourages initiative, allows people to use their professional judgement, and maintains accountability for results.

Managers remain responsible for defining priorities and expected outcomes, while employees decide how best to achieve them within the agreed framework.

Reduce unnecessary micromanagement

Micromanagement often develops with good intentions.

Managers want to prevent mistakes, maintain quality, or keep projects on schedule.

However, constant supervision can unintentionally reduce employees' opportunities to think independently and solve problems themselves.

It also increases the number of routine decisions that managers need to make.

When employees are trusted to handle appropriate day-to-day decisions within clear boundaries, managers gain more time to focus on planning, coordination, and longer-term priorities.

This benefits employees through greater ownership of their work while allowing managers to maintain a clearer overview of the organisation as a whole.

Create opportunities for learning

Influence develops alongside competence.

Providing coaching, constructive feedback, and opportunities to learn from experience helps employees make confident decisions while continuing to develop professionally.

Mistakes become opportunities for learning and improvement, helping both employees and managers build confidence over time.

Explain the reasons behind decisions

Not every decision can be delegated.

Budget constraints, legal requirements, safety considerations, or organisational strategy sometimes require managers to make the final choice.

Explaining why decisions have been made helps employees understand the wider context and reduces unnecessary uncertainty.

Even when people cannot influence the final outcome, understanding the reasoning behind it often makes change easier to accept.

Trust and Responsibility Grow Together

Trust develops gradually.

As employees demonstrate reliability and sound judgement, managers can confidently increase the level of responsibility they delegate.

Greater responsibility often strengthens ownership of the work.

People who feel trusted are more likely to contribute ideas, solve problems proactively, and take pride in achieving shared goals.

Over time, trust, responsibility, and engagement reinforce one another, creating teams that are increasingly capable of adapting independently to changing circumstances.

A Healthy Workplace Culture Makes Influence Possible

Meaningful influence develops most naturally in organisations where trust, communication, and learning are already part of the culture.

Employees are more likely to take initiative when they feel comfortable asking questions, discussing mistakes openly, and contributing ideas without fear of unnecessary criticism.

Managers also find it easier to delegate responsibility when trust has developed gradually within the team.

Our article How to Build a Low-Stress Company Culture That Also Boosts Performance explores how workplace culture supports both employee wellbeing and sustainable organisational performance.

Benefits Throughout the Organisation

Giving employees greater influence over their work supports more than individual wellbeing.

Employees often experience greater engagement, motivation, and job satisfaction when they can apply their professional judgement and contribute to decisions that affect their work.

Managers benefit as well.

When teams can make appropriate day-to-day decisions independently, managers spend less time approving routine tasks or answering minor questions.

This creates more space to focus on strategic priorities, develop their teams, and respond to larger organisational challenges.

Reducing unnecessary micromanagement also lowers the cognitive demands placed on managers themselves.

At the organisational level, clearer decision making, greater ownership, and faster problem solving often improve both performance and adaptability.

Healthy organisations depend on people being able to respond effectively to changing circumstances while working towards shared objectives.

Supporting Healthier Adaptation at Work

Workplace stress develops through interactions between demands, recovery, and the conditions in which people work.

Meaningful influence helps people respond to demanding projects, difficult decisions, and periods of intense work with greater flexibility, clearer thinking, and a stronger sense of ownership.

Together with realistic workloads, supportive leadership, opportunities for recovery, open communication, and a positive workplace culture, it creates healthier conditions for long-term adaptation.

Creating these conditions benefits employees, managers, and organisations alike by supporting both sustainable performance and long-term wellbeing.

Putting These Ideas into Practice

Creating healthier workplaces rarely depends on one change alone.

Giving employees greater influence over their work is most effective when it is combined with supportive leadership, clear communication, realistic workloads, opportunities for recovery, and a workplace culture built on trust.

If you'd like to explore these topics further, these articles provide a useful next step:

If your organisation wants to translate these principles into everyday practice, StressInsight also offers consultancy that helps organisations create healthier working environments while maintaining high performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does giving employees more autonomy reduce productivity?
Research generally suggests the opposite. Within clear organisational goals, appropriate autonomy often improves engagement, ownership, and problem solving while allowing managers to focus on broader priorities.

Is autonomy the same as a lack of supervision?
Effective leadership combines clear expectations with appropriate freedom in how work is organised and completed. Employees benefit from knowing both the direction they are working towards and the responsibilities they hold.

Can every job provide the same level of autonomy?
No. Safety requirements, legal obligations, and operational needs differ between professions. Even in highly regulated environments, organisations can often increase employees' influence over aspects of their daily work.

Why does influence reduce stress?
Having meaningful influence increases predictability and allows people to respond more flexibly to changing demands. This supports healthier adaptation to sustained pressure over time.

Comments
Categories